Skip to main content

‘I’ve got no idea how to use Sketchup, so how can my pupils use it?’

This post follows on my reflections about #IEF_2010.  It’s a post that illustrates the point that innovative teachers are not alone in the world, and far from mad!  Often, an innovative teacher will feel like a mad person in a room shouting at the rain.  Meeting other ‘mad people’ from around the world makes one feel less mad, especially when it comes from some of the speakers below.  But first a story…

Google Sketchup is a tool that allows users to create 3D buildings and models. These can then be embedded in Google Earth.  I first learned about the programme via Noel Jenkins, but thought I couldn’t possibly use it with classes as I knew very little about it. Then  thought ‘What if?’ What if I took the risk.  So, I put Sketchup on a number of machines in school, and told pupils that it was there but had no clue how to use it. The result?  Some great work using the tool.

I’ve also always preferred to dive straight into complicated topics, even assessments, without much build up.  I encourage this in my team.  The logic being that young people will work out the knowledge that they need in order to pass the assessment. 

So what’s the point in the story and what has it got to do with the Innovative Education Forum?

The point is that a little voice always told me that this was not the way to do things.  Then I was lucky enough to hear Professor Sugata Mitra speak.  In effect, his main point was that young people will learn without any help. 

The message is repeated elsewhere. When reading Super Freakonomics on the plane back, I was struck by the implementation of a new computer system in an ER in Chicago.  There was a a huge battle to get the system implemented, so the designer loaded the programme on to on computer and attached a sign ‘Beta Test: Do Not Use.’  The result was that doctors and nurses started to play around with the system.  They liked it, and now that system is marketed by Microsoft and has a home in many hospitals.

There are two messages in this story. The first is that adults are just like kids – we are all mixed ability learners.  The second is that learning had taken place without any real intervention after an educated risk was taken.

So , what does this mean for the classroom and subject leadership?

I think means that as teachers we have to take risks.  We can do this by not knowing the outcome, or allowing pupils to learn.

This leads to the thought that subject leaders should allow their staff to take risks.  Sometimes, for example, a risk may result in a lower set of Key Stage 3 Levels, however the learning may still have been better.  It also means that we should support behaviour and allow colleagues the confidence to trust young people to be independent.

I don’t think that risks should be taken all of the time, however – how can anyone improve without taking any?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What makes a learning experience profound? Personal reflections and possible implications for classroom practice.

I have recently begun a Leadership Pathways journey.  As part of the first core day, we were asked to reflect on a profound learning experience. This got me thinking about how many profound learning experiences I have both been involved in, and how many I have been able to give to others.  Our group came up with a huge long list, but these are my five. Emotional Connected Demanding Reflective Collaborative As always, these are personal thoughts and quite mixed up.  I put them here so that I can look back on them (plus they’d get lost inside my world-cup-free brain) 1. Emotional I can’t think of a time where deep learning hasn’t engaged my emotions.  From being awe inspired to that tingle feeling when a student gets a light bulb moment.  From this-is-the-happiest-day-ever, to I-think-I’m-about-to die.  How often do we engage the emotions of those we teach?  Here, I would argue that having a safe learning environment is not always conducive to profound

The danger of Teaching and Twitter conversations: poorly formed bipolar arguments.

Sometimes in life, there really are only two options.  Get the wrong one and you can look like a muppet.  Take this useful sign for the toilets in Morocco.  I successfully navigated it, choosing the right option.  The result? No egg on my face.  As a mountain leader, there are many right or wrong decisions that I’ve faced, as there are all over life.  It’s not a good idea to let inexperienced young people walk themselves down Snowdon.  They may die or be seriously injured.  If someone is showing the signs and symptoms of hyperthermia, you need to treat it fast in a specified way.  There is no real arguing with this sign: Other options are less obvious.  Take this sign recently spotted near to where I live: Now, I wouldn’t consider sleeping in a bin.  However, faced with a sub-zero night, I could see the appeal.  The danger? Being tipped into one of those huge lorries with a compactor. (by the way, I only really considered all of this thanks to questions from my four year old boy).

Banned Word Board

Today I want to share some simple ideas that I have found to be very effective in the classroom. I can't say that they are my own original ideas, although I have played around with them. The first is the Banned word Board. This is a simple display in the classroom that lists a number of words that are not allowed to be used by pupils in their written or oral answers. The effect has been an increase in the quality of written work, and I have almost made comments such as 'Sir it's simple, the stuff just affects the thing and causes people problems'. Pupils are now more able to use specific language, something that is vital especially at GCSE. I have had to make a few modifications, such as the introduction of 'Heavenly Words' This is an additional display placed on the ceiling. I found this necessary as pupils needed some stimulus in finding replacement words. After advice received after posting the idea on the SLN forum , I have also introduced semi-banned words