Skip to main content

Eyes were invented before technology - getting young people to read the landscape

Just time for a quick story. Back from a day along the East Sussex coast - classic gemorphological sites such as Birling Gap, Cuckmere Haven and Rottingdean. The day is set up to tell a story, moving from an undefended stretch of coast where nature will be allowed to take place uninterrupted to Rottingdean where humans are 'holding the line.' The narrative of such a day is just as important as what is measured.
The day is about the complex interplay between human activity (spanning hundreds of years in the case of Birling Gap and Cuckmere Haven) and unstoppable physical processes. Of course, there's loads of measurement, field sketches, talk and questioning about processes, landforms and human decisions. But then there are also the moments where measurement takes place by using the human mind and brain.
Those that have been out in the field with me, whether on a Geography fieldtrip or expedition, know the phrase 'Eyes were invented before (map/compass/ranging ole/theodolite/flow meter).' This is all about encouraging young people to 'read' the landscape and to value what they see. this requires reference to thoughts feelings and, dare I say it 'hippy' moments of reflection.
Some may say that there is no room in school to provide such madness and that it is the parents responsibility to provide such experiences. I'd say those people are talking out of their arse.
1. Part of being a successful academic geographer is the ability to 'read' the landscape. Yes, this requires a deep understanding of map skills, geomorphic processes and a wealth of academic knowledge on the grand theory of human decisions and interaction. However, it also requires empathy and the ability to understand the role of human nature.
2. Some children don't have the luxury of having supportive parents. I assume from the attitude of the traditionalists (surprisingly Labour supporting left, people I thought would be all for helping out those who are unfortunate - perhaps they are more New Labour Right or UKIP?) that we shouldn't care about these.
3. Doing the mad stuff that is slightly not academic means that it is more likely for young people to fall in love with a subject as they see the landscape 'come to life' and are able to recognise their place within it. With this knowledge, they can go on to change this landscape, whether it be a school, Rhondda Valley, city or country. Indeed, doing non-academic parental stuff in schools I've been involved with has allowed young people to successfully campaign and change their school environment.
We need well rounded individuals and Sir Anthony Seldon agrees. Those from privileged backgrounds and schools don't get to where they are JUST because they have bomber academic qualifications, but because they are given rich experiences within which to develop character.
The rock at the top? The highlight of my day as a Year 10, disengaged boy, fell in love with geology right there on the beach today. He'll also come out with fantastic grades, mainly because I'm someone who doesn't believe in the false dichotomy that others thrive off. Indeed, they create it because it gets them attention. The answer is a blend of the progressive and traditionalist. Watch my lessons and the advice I give to those I lead over the year and it's a balance between the academic skill and well-rounded experiences. What's the point of a young person who has the grades but who can't give a good impression with a solid handshake and anecdotes of when they have faced a challenge? Will they land a better job without any passion?
Good job that many of them aren't in any danger of actually being in charge of anything past their own, closed classrooms.
I'm a life-long Labour party member, but I'm not a Labour teacher. They seem a little too Right Wing.
(OK @rlj1981  ,they may have dislodged a small pebble ;)

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

High Impact, Low effort

This month is the start of the #29daysofwriting challenge.  I enjoyed this last year and will be using my Staffrm account to post.  I'll also be reporting here, both to give a little more detail and to keep a log of what I have written. The challenge developed a great sense of community last year, which is why I'm choosing to write on Staffrm. What I would say to those who are new to writing or don't want to run out of ideas is: Write for yourself. Clarify an idea, write something out loud. The process of distilling thoughts into writing is immensely beneficial to your practice. If other read, comment and respond, that's a bonus. Ignore the muppets who know nothing of your context, style or students. Mix it up - I like to read about real stuff from real classrooms and schools and also about other stuff.  If we always write about school, how does that work for workload? If you've nothing nice to say, don't say it. So, the following has been 

What makes a learning experience profound? Personal reflections and possible implications for classroom practice.

I have recently begun a Leadership Pathways journey.  As part of the first core day, we were asked to reflect on a profound learning experience. This got me thinking about how many profound learning experiences I have both been involved in, and how many I have been able to give to others.  Our group came up with a huge long list, but these are my five. Emotional Connected Demanding Reflective Collaborative As always, these are personal thoughts and quite mixed up.  I put them here so that I can look back on them (plus they’d get lost inside my world-cup-free brain) 1. Emotional I can’t think of a time where deep learning hasn’t engaged my emotions.  From being awe inspired to that tingle feeling when a student gets a light bulb moment.  From this-is-the-happiest-day-ever, to I-think-I’m-about-to die.  How often do we engage the emotions of those we teach?  Here, I would argue that having a safe learning environment is not always conducive to profound

The danger of Teaching and Twitter conversations: poorly formed bipolar arguments.

Sometimes in life, there really are only two options.  Get the wrong one and you can look like a muppet.  Take this useful sign for the toilets in Morocco.  I successfully navigated it, choosing the right option.  The result? No egg on my face.  As a mountain leader, there are many right or wrong decisions that I’ve faced, as there are all over life.  It’s not a good idea to let inexperienced young people walk themselves down Snowdon.  They may die or be seriously injured.  If someone is showing the signs and symptoms of hyperthermia, you need to treat it fast in a specified way.  There is no real arguing with this sign: Other options are less obvious.  Take this sign recently spotted near to where I live: Now, I wouldn’t consider sleeping in a bin.  However, faced with a sub-zero night, I could see the appeal.  The danger? Being tipped into one of those huge lorries with a compactor. (by the way, I only really considered all of this thanks to questions from my four year old boy).