Skip to main content

A summer of reading and implications for school leadership.

2013-08-21 15.14.40

Soon I start at Patcham High School and I was asked to glance over some books in preparation.  A couple of these have been around for a while, but itā€™s always good to refresh the memory.  My overall impression is that thereā€™s no real ā€˜the wayā€™ to teach or treat young people.  Much of the research falls within psychology and other realms, research in its nature is reductionist and is prone to generalisation, but many of the stories presented link to some of my experience in the classroom and leadership.  These books tend to cite similar sources of information and even each other. For example, all of these books focus on the fact that measures of intelligence were designed so that interventions could be put into place to get children back on track.  All four also focus on the role of teacher feedback.  They are also written in a populist way, something that works better for the journalists rather than the researchers.  Iā€™m not considering the validity and reliability of the messages or research as Iā€™d rather assume teachers are able to make up their own mind.

This post serves as a summary of the work, with some possible implications for practice and leadership. Iā€™ve tried to highlight the key message (as interpreted by me, for me) of each book as I find that the main thrust is often covered within the first few pages, and then repeated throughout like a Channel 4 ā€˜documentaryā€™ā€™ allowing skim reading.  What follows are reflections for me to return to, and the ā€˜thinking out lousā€™ that follows may be useful to others.

A slight caveat is that I often find myself nodding along to these books, finding that the approach already forms part of my toolkit.  In that way, these publications are preaching to the converted.  I consider them to be thought shrapnel though and reading about and discussing teaching and learning can not be a bad thing.  As a leader, I would expect all teachers to be familiar with  what is written.

The Elephant in the Classroom is a great read.  This was unexpected if Iā€™m honest.  The first message is that this book isnā€™t just for maths teachers and school leaders as it contains some powerful messages for all leaders.  Through my role in supporting NQTs, Iā€™ve seen quiet a few maths lessons over the past twelve months and many of the messages rung true. Essentially, Jo Boaler provides a counterpoint to the approach that most schools take of killing maths, such as turning the subject into an exams factory that has squashed the enjoyment and love out of the subject.  Personally, I welcome any move toward not allowing resist of examinations, especially for the benefit of league tables.  In addition, anecdotes, articles and books continue to shout the message that exam results will rise anyway as better approaches are adopted.  Elephant isnā€™t and exception to this and itā€™s a welcome message.  Boalerā€™s main message is that school maths isnā€™t real maths as it has little in common with either the real world or what maths can be.

Secondly, Boaler argues against the early setting of children by ability and presents both argument and research findings to support mixed ability teaching.  As a geographer who has always taught in mixed ability classes, Iā€™ve never understood streaming students as Iā€™ve found that by explaining to others, higher ability students do better and less able and disaffected students tend to do better as they are exposed to model answers as well as behaviour. Iā€™ve never been comfortable with labelling students early on, and Iā€™ve often had to tackle students who have a low opinion of their ability because they are in lower sets in other core subjects.

The Elephant in the Classroom contains a wealth of teaching tips that can be easily adapted to any classroom, as well as specific maths problems.  There are also problems to solve, with the workings out in the back.  I loved this, as a geographer my undergraduate degrees were full of maths, stats and physics, so I get the importance of maths.  Maths should be a creative subject focused on problem solving. As a parent, I certainly have much ammunition and ideas to support Henry through school maths.

How Children Succeed also focuses on the dangers of labelling young people too early and explores the relationship between character development and attainment.  There is a very interesting comparison between inner city schools and affluent, fee-paying schools in New York.  Central to the book, is whether teachers should be teaching and reporting upon character skills, such as self-control and willpower, as well as knowledge and understanding.  Iā€™m reminded of Personal Learning and Thinking Skills and Social and Emotional Aspects of Learning here.  From my experience of working in school serving deprived wards in the UK, I can confirm that young people do achieve better results if they are mentored through ā€˜studyā€™ skills.  I enjoyed reading Paul Toughā€™s book.

Finally, Mindsetā€™s central premise is that your basic qualities can change through effort.  This is something that I donā€™t disagree with, but then Iā€™ve always been an individual who believes that you can do anything .  The most useful aspects of the book for me were the sections on feedback.  Dweck highlights the importance of honest and constructive feedback to children in order for them to improve.  In other words, thereā€™s no point in trying to make young people feel better.  There are links here with comment only marking techniques and their well established linked to higher achievement.  A very good point is that praise for effort and constructive critic aimed at improvement is far better than praising intelligence.  Iā€™m reminded of behaviour techniques here when you point out the problem behaviour and not a problem with the child: ā€˜I like you, but your habit of punching other people is getting in the way of your learning.ā€™  A habit can be broken.

Differentiation is another common theme through these books.  Chiefly that neither the ā€˜lowerā€™ or ā€˜higherā€™ ability students are challenged enough. Indeed, labelling a child as low ability is a self-fulfilling prophecy where a lack of challenge from teachers coupled with the inability to acknowledge  that young people learn at different rates means that these students often.  One of my favourite quotes is ā€˜thereā€™s a lot of intelligence out there being waster by underestimating studentsā€™ potential to developā€™ (p64).

Mindset also challenges teachers to be learners also and to take risk.  This is trick unless there is a supportive atmosphere to work within where risk taking is encouraged when it leads to doing things better (in this case, teaching and learning). Dweck believe that great teachers (or parents) are fascinated with the process of learning; believe that young peopleā€™s intellect and talent can be developed and have high standards and expectations within a nurturing atmosphere.  What is there to disagree with?

So, implications for leadership?

  • Itā€™s important that teachers at all levels engage with and understand research and books such as these.  Itā€™s not good enough to be told about them if sustainable systems are to be developed.
  • Trail changes.
  • Keep high expectations of success of every single child.
  • Examine how some of the key messages can be incorporated into feedback and assessment policies and CPD.
  • Allow staff to take risks, make mistakes and learn from them in order to promote better outcomes and learning.

What do you  think?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

High Impact, Low effort

This month is the start of the #29daysofwriting challenge.  I enjoyed this last year and will be using my Staffrm account to post.  I'll also be reporting here, both to give a little more detail and to keep a log of what I have written. The challenge developed a great sense of community last year, which is why I'm choosing to write on Staffrm. What I would say to those who are new to writing or don't want to run out of ideas is: Write for yourself. Clarify an idea, write something out loud. The process of distilling thoughts into writing is immensely beneficial to your practice. If other read, comment and respond, that's a bonus. Ignore the muppets who know nothing of your context, style or students. Mix it up - I like to read about real stuff from real classrooms and schools and also about other stuff.  If we always write about school, how does that work for workload? If you've nothing nice to say, don't say it. So, the following has been ...

What makes a learning experience profound? Personal reflections and possible implications for classroom practice.

I have recently begun a Leadership Pathways journey.  As part of the first core day, we were asked to reflect on a profound learning experience. This got me thinking about how many profound learning experiences I have both been involved in, and how many I have been able to give to others.  Our group came up with a huge long list, but these are my five. Emotional Connected Demanding Reflective Collaborative As always, these are personal thoughts and quite mixed up.  I put them here so that I can look back on them (plus theyā€™d get lost inside my world-cup-free brain) 1. Emotional I canā€™t think of a time where deep learning hasnā€™t engaged my emotions.  From being awe inspired to that tingle feeling when a student gets a light bulb moment.  From this-is-the-happiest-day-ever, to I-think-Iā€™m-about-to die.  How often do we engage the emotions of those we teach?  Here, I would argue that having a safe learning environment i...

Banned Word Board

Today I want to share some simple ideas that I have found to be very effective in the classroom. I can't say that they are my own original ideas, although I have played around with them. The first is the Banned word Board. This is a simple display in the classroom that lists a number of words that are not allowed to be used by pupils in their written or oral answers. The effect has been an increase in the quality of written work, and I have almost made comments such as 'Sir it's simple, the stuff just affects the thing and causes people problems'. Pupils are now more able to use specific language, something that is vital especially at GCSE. I have had to make a few modifications, such as the introduction of 'Heavenly Words' This is an additional display placed on the ceiling. I found this necessary as pupils needed some stimulus in finding replacement words. After advice received after posting the idea on the SLN forum , I have also introduced semi-banned words...