Skip to main content

Reflections on #TLAB13 6 of 6: Final keynote from Bill Rankin [@rankinw ]

2013-03-16 15.40.46

This is the final post of six reflecting upon the Teaching, Learning and Assessment Conference held at Berkhamsted School.   This post will provide an overview the closing keynote session by Bill Rankin.

The session definately came away with the prize for most entertaining, and in the graveyard slot this was needed.  Especially for people like me who have trouble concentrating at the best of times!  Iā€™m going to focus on some of the main themes that I took away from the session, and my thoughts about them.  Iā€™m not certain about the scientific basis for some of this as Iā€™m still following them up, however the points have created some interesting discussion.

2013-03-16 15.51.02

 

The first thing that got me thinking was this slide.  In a nutshell, young peopleā€™s brains are inactive during class.  I tried to link this to my own experience.  Of course, the immediate reaction is to dash the notion on the rocks of sillyness.  However, think beyond my own class room and department and to some of the other lessons Iā€™ve observed this year and there is a ring of truth.  Furthermore, talking to students this week about this and they can relate to it.  Now, this may be anecdotal but does confirm something that I believe in strongly and that is students shouldn't be allowed to be passive within lessons.  They should be doing.  Donā€™t confuse this with being practical.

2013-03-16 16.11.27

The next feature that stuck out was the analogy made between classrooms and corn fields.  I found this useful as food for thought.  My interpretation is that a corn field is devoid of most life and doesnā€™t encourage relationships to form between different organic elements.  The ultimate reason for this is that the end process (harvesting) needs to be mechanised to maximise profit.  Schools in the UK at the moment could be seen to be trying to maximise classrooms for increased attainment (not achievement).  This narrow focus on assessment outcomes means that many of the rich experiences needed to survive and earn in the world at the moment are not developed.  Yes, there are relationships in nature that are harmful as well as beneficial, the same as in schools and classrooms.

Rankin offered two models on which to pin education:

2013-03-16 16.25.32

The first to encourage learning interactions, aiming to create experiences that will develop the whole young person.  How for example do we measure compassion?

2013-03-16 16.33.10

The second is a process that teachers could use in designing learning experiences.  To me, this is similar to the outdoor education worldā€™s ā€˜Plan-Do-Reviewā€™ process.  Bill offered two examples of this in action and also linked it to working with young children:

  • What do you feel should change in your school?
  • Imagine what the school would be like if that was changed?
  • How could we do something about it?
  • How do we share this?

Iā€™m using this idea at the moment with Year 8 when we are investigating the sustainability of our school.

There were a couple of points that didnā€™t sit too well with me:

  • The well-worn ā€˜world in their pocketā€™ view that young people have lots of technology.  Yes, the majority may well have access to recording studios and the like, but do they have the maturity to use them to greatest effect?   The danger with using examples like the one below to illustrate what children could do is that these individuals (in my view) would be doing amazing things whatever their technological context.  They arenā€™t creative and successful because of technology, they are just creative. Having said this, I subscribe to the view of building real audience into tasks and doing things because you can!
  • The second is that I remember exploring diversity and the effect of disability by having to stay in a wheelchair.  A similar thread is embedded in the our curriculum where children have to wear glasses that force them to act like someone with no hearing or a different language.  Could be done by wearing hats too. 

Anyway ā€“ itā€™s getting late!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What makes a learning experience profound? Personal reflections and possible implications for classroom practice.

I have recently begun a Leadership Pathways journey.  As part of the first core day, we were asked to reflect on a profound learning experience. This got me thinking about how many profound learning experiences I have both been involved in, and how many I have been able to give to others.  Our group came up with a huge long list, but these are my five. Emotional Connected Demanding Reflective Collaborative As always, these are personal thoughts and quite mixed up.  I put them here so that I can look back on them (plus theyā€™d get lost inside my world-cup-free brain) 1. Emotional I canā€™t think of a time where deep learning hasnā€™t engaged my emotions.  From being awe inspired to that tingle feeling when a student gets a light bulb moment.  From this-is-the-happiest-day-ever, to I-think-Iā€™m-about-to die.  How often do we engage the emotions of those we teach?  Here, I would argue that having a safe learning environment i...

Banned Word Board

Today I want to share some simple ideas that I have found to be very effective in the classroom. I can't say that they are my own original ideas, although I have played around with them. The first is the Banned word Board. This is a simple display in the classroom that lists a number of words that are not allowed to be used by pupils in their written or oral answers. The effect has been an increase in the quality of written work, and I have almost made comments such as 'Sir it's simple, the stuff just affects the thing and causes people problems'. Pupils are now more able to use specific language, something that is vital especially at GCSE. I have had to make a few modifications, such as the introduction of 'Heavenly Words' This is an additional display placed on the ceiling. I found this necessary as pupils needed some stimulus in finding replacement words. After advice received after posting the idea on the SLN forum , I have also introduced semi-banned words...

Eliminating workload: are curriculum change, behaviour and tutoring the elephants in the room?

The three reports published in March by the workload review groups make interesting reading. They have been informed by the workload survey, although didn't contain a huge proportion of teachers nor make much reference to research (with the exception of the planning report). The recommendations, to me and the team I work with, are common sense. However, three activities that generate workload were missing and the process has failed to take a holistic approach because, let's face it, all issues are workload issues, indeed each report contains the standard phrase 'there is no single reason behind excessive workload.' The three areas missing are top down curriculum change, behaviour management and tutoring.  Now, before I start, all of these are essential, but do have major workload implications, especially if we want teachers to focus on the main thing, which is teaching and learning. Every decision made should ensure that teachers are able to collaboratively plan s...