Skip to main content

Textbooks: everyone's guilty pleasure and a workload saver


Disclaimer: I was provided two copies of the GA's KS3 geography Teachers' Toolkit for free in return for an honest review.

I've wrote back in 2009 that textbooks are everyone's guilty pleasure. The fashion at the time was for textbook bashing, especially amongst members of the Geographical Association (The GA) which was a bit strange as they are also a publisher. Now I have a confession to make: I write textbooks. There, get over it. The problem with the discourse around textbooks is that they focus on the artefact and publisher rather than their use in the classroom. In my view, the appropriate use of textbooks is just like using an anemometer, a bunsen burner or a computer: a tool in the shed of the great teacher. Yes, textbooks have limitations and the department I led even used textbooks to create bunting, but used well they are a timesaver. I'm also neither in the progressive nor traditional camp (not that I'm entirely sure what each one actually is). I use what works with the students in front of me.

In addition, much is written about teacher workloads and wellbeing. Having worked with trainee teachers and in a number of geography departments, it always amazes me at how willing teachers are to reinvent the wheel. Yes, there are some brilliant fresh ideas (I certainly benefitted from the brilliant work of Tony Cassidy, Alan Parkinson and Noel Jenkins), but mainly content stays the same. To me it seems counterproductive to banish textbooks, which are usually well researched and written in some detail. They also contain a wealth of resources (although many fall short of delivering upon Geographical Information Systems).

I was pleased to look through two copies of the GA's KS3 Geography Teachers' Toolkit: The Role of Stones and Through Think and Thin which focus on geology and glaciation.  Although the original titles of this extensive series were published too late for the 2007 national curriculum, the latest titles tackle some of the areas that may have traditionally been neglected by departments at Key Stage 3 and those that teachers tell me they are least confident in. This is good to see. I spent the summer term teaching the glaciation unit to Year 8 and found the books very useful and they certainly live up to the claim of being directly applicable to the classroom, indeed sometimes it seems as if they are a series of TeachMeet presentations around one topic.


In addition, I welcome the aim of the series to provide 'material for immediate and direct use with students with minimal preparation.' (page 4 Editors' Preface). What I like about each title is that it contains a rationale for teaching the topic, a medium term plan, individual lesson plans that blend background theory with practical pedagogical ideas as well as a wealth of electronic downloads that support the unit. In other words, they are a tailor made unit of work.


Of course, most department will want to tweak and adapt the schemes of work and if they are truly to provide an 'exciting and challenging' curriculum especially the assessment framework which I found lacked ambition because of it's differentiated learning objectives - it just doesn't sit well that we should accept that some students will progress as a slower rate and therefore we should expect less of them and departments will need to spend some time around how they will fit the unites into their institutions assessment model. Having said this, I love the graphical way that the series presents the curriculum links so it's easy to visualise the value of following the whole sequences of lessons rather than individual lessons. . It would be good if some assessments were given, especially ones that increase the rigour of Key Stage 3 and prepare young people for the high stakes GCSE and A'Level testing.

Another niggle is that I find the Starter, Main, Plenary model presented in the book restrictive and not conducive to quality teaching, but this is a minor niggle that is more than made up for by the quality resources and background theory. Indeed, I would expect that even the novice teacher, a non-specialist or one not confident in the topic to be able to teach the unit from the resources given.

I find these books highly accessible and the online content easily adaptable and of high quality. I love the overview of each unit and a gem is the little tips that encourage high quality geography. For example the Geology book provides some golden nuggets about how students can interrogate a photo depicting a rock covered in moss - a real strength.  Having also used the China title in the series in the past I would recommend this series. Get at least one of them and use them to develop a unit before going further. Certainly, if you are in a lone department or leading a number of specialists the book deliver a good blend of background theory and practical ideas. The lesson-by-lesson scheme of work would be easy to follow and I like the way that local fieldwork opportunities are presented (although there is a lack of GIS opportunities in the titles under review). Finally, the units are well thought out and integrated, which means that the lessons follow a logical sequence and link to each other rather than sit as one offs.

Overall, I would recommend this series. They are a time saver (I've used the glaciation book to map our curriculum directly into 4Matrix's new Assessment Without Levels framework); model high quality geography and live up to their claim of providing resources that can be used directly with classes.  Of course, as with any resource, they should be adapted and fitted into your own context and I some work is needed around assessment. Another main strength is that these will be accessible to non-specialists and veteran teachers alike. They would also be a useful addition to primary schools as some of the ideas and content would be accessible. I doff my cap to the GA.



Image credit 'old geography textbook' from Flickr used under the Creative Commons.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

High Impact, Low effort

This month is the start of the #29daysofwriting challenge.  I enjoyed this last year and will be using my Staffrm account to post.  I'll also be reporting here, both to give a little more detail and to keep a log of what I have written. The challenge developed a great sense of community last year, which is why I'm choosing to write on Staffrm. What I would say to those who are new to writing or don't want to run out of ideas is: Write for yourself. Clarify an idea, write something out loud. The process of distilling thoughts into writing is immensely beneficial to your practice. If other read, comment and respond, that's a bonus. Ignore the muppets who know nothing of your context, style or students. Mix it up - I like to read about real stuff from real classrooms and schools and also about other stuff.  If we always write about school, how does that work for workload? If you've nothing nice to say, don't say it. So, the following has been ...

What makes a learning experience profound? Personal reflections and possible implications for classroom practice.

I have recently begun a Leadership Pathways journey.  As part of the first core day, we were asked to reflect on a profound learning experience. This got me thinking about how many profound learning experiences I have both been involved in, and how many I have been able to give to others.  Our group came up with a huge long list, but these are my five. Emotional Connected Demanding Reflective Collaborative As always, these are personal thoughts and quite mixed up.  I put them here so that I can look back on them (plus they’d get lost inside my world-cup-free brain) 1. Emotional I can’t think of a time where deep learning hasn’t engaged my emotions.  From being awe inspired to that tingle feeling when a student gets a light bulb moment.  From this-is-the-happiest-day-ever, to I-think-I’m-about-to die.  How often do we engage the emotions of those we teach?  Here, I would argue that having a safe learning environment i...

Banned Word Board

Today I want to share some simple ideas that I have found to be very effective in the classroom. I can't say that they are my own original ideas, although I have played around with them. The first is the Banned word Board. This is a simple display in the classroom that lists a number of words that are not allowed to be used by pupils in their written or oral answers. The effect has been an increase in the quality of written work, and I have almost made comments such as 'Sir it's simple, the stuff just affects the thing and causes people problems'. Pupils are now more able to use specific language, something that is vital especially at GCSE. I have had to make a few modifications, such as the introduction of 'Heavenly Words' This is an additional display placed on the ceiling. I found this necessary as pupils needed some stimulus in finding replacement words. After advice received after posting the idea on the SLN forum , I have also introduced semi-banned words...