Skip to main content

The danger of ‘core knowledge.’ Have teachers lost the ability to be ‘curriculum makers?’


Have you noticed that some teachers are becoming unable to think for themselves?  It’s a trend in the Twitterverse and blogs and CPD events and staffrooms.  You know the call: ‘But the new National Curriculum / GCSE specification doesn’t mention climate change, so how can we teach it?’  The trouble is, as I see it, that teachers have become used to the spoon feeding provided by the National Curriculum and publishing companies.  If we aren’t told to teach it, then we can’t teach it.  We comply, understandably, to meet the current trends in what we should be teaching.

In addition, there’s a real danger that the curriculum in schools will become fossilised if we, as a profession, don’t think outside of the documents and texts produced.  This isn’t an attack on knowledge.  Knowledge should underpin teaching and learning.  I’m also not anti publishers, I write resources and textbooks so that would be mental.  The problem is that I wonder if teachers are too worried about moaning about the system rather than focusing on what they should be teaching.  Some have argued with me that teachers should be concerned with pedagogy and not what should be taught.  That’s simply bonkers.  At least at Secondary level, why shouldn’t experts in their subject not be involved in shaping what is taught?

Here’s an example from the geography curriculum, prompted by some tweets from a PTI event at the weekend. 

In terms of economic development, the BRIC countries (Brazil, India, Russia and China) are emerging economies and it’s great to see them in the latest National Curriculum documents.  The problem is, what about the MINT countries? Mexico, Indonesia, Nigeria and Turkey have been identified as the next emerging economies.  Look at the following graphic (taken from here).

GDP in 2012 and 2050

This would be great to kick off a geography lesson.  I wonder how many geography teachers consider where the term BRIC came from?  Both BRIC and MINT were acronyms coined by the economist Jim O’Neill.   If geography is a dynamic subject, then shouldn't we be looking at predictions, their reliability and possible impacts?  I fear that the next range of books and examinations will limit teachers to considering what they are told to look at, rather than considering the latest developments in the subject.

Perhaps this is limited to geography?  Personally, I don’t think so.  I studied History to A’Level and have a very keen interest in it now.  Recently, I was interested to discover that there was controversy around the Battle of Hastings linked to its location.  New interpretations of history are unearthed often and I image that many other subjects are just as dynamic.  I accept that the same may not be said for all subjects.

My point?  I think that teachers should be making decisions on what should be taught as well as how.  They are equally important elements.  A worthwhile curriculum should also be contextualised to the local area. The purpose of education?  I can’t answer that to be honest, but a huge chunk of it is teaching how young people can continue to learn beyond the classroom.  Whatever happens in the future, I wonder how much of the knowledge gained in schools will be vital to the future?  I’m learning all of the time.  When I don’t know something, I look it up or just get on and figure it out.  This could be through reading, watching YouTube tutorials (great for learning how to grapple with Excel), talking to people and so on….  My main problem is that I’m not that confident with those that are deciding upon what knowledge is required.  It’s just their opinion.

The term ‘curriculum maker’ is used by the Geographical Association and I would urge teachers to decide on the knowledge taught as well as the manner in which it is taught.  Of course, this doesn’t involve setting up young people for failure by not covering what will be examined.  Simply considering the opportunity to explore other contexts and ideas.

Maybe this is way wide of the mark, or perhaps it’s preaching to the converted.  Either way, if teachers are spoon fed what to teach is it any wonder that young people are spoon fed to pass examinations?

Photo Credit


Popular posts from this blog

#GAConf22: A paradigm shift for anti-racist, decolonised teaching and inclusion

 " You can't start a fire,  You can't start a fire without a spark" Bruce Springsteen.  Well, it's been a fair while since I felt the motivation or the need to blog. Whilst not a story for now, over the past five years I've danced along the knife edge and, often, the call of the abyss has been both tempting and compelling. Certainly, my failing in both my personal and professional life have been numerous. But. This is not about me, but the people that have (re)ignited the spark to the fire in my soul. I realise that this is from the perspective of a privileged, white, middle class male view. I even have a beard. I am scared of getting it wrong on this topic. Teach me if I am wrong, it is from the position of a learner. I was looking forward to the GA Conference this year, the first face to face since 2019. I have to say that Alan , as president, and the Geographical Association's team did a fantastic job at being inclusive. The hybrid format allowed peopl

What makes a learning experience profound? Personal reflections and possible implications for classroom practice.

I have recently begun a Leadership Pathways journey.  As part of the first core day, we were asked to reflect on a profound learning experience. This got me thinking about how many profound learning experiences I have both been involved in, and how many I have been able to give to others.  Our group came up with a huge long list, but these are my five. Emotional Connected Demanding Reflective Collaborative As always, these are personal thoughts and quite mixed up.  I put them here so that I can look back on them (plus they’d get lost inside my world-cup-free brain) 1. Emotional I can’t think of a time where deep learning hasn’t engaged my emotions.  From being awe inspired to that tingle feeling when a student gets a light bulb moment.  From this-is-the-happiest-day-ever, to I-think-I’m-about-to die.  How often do we engage the emotions of those we teach?  Here, I would argue that having a safe learning environment is not always conducive to profound

Trust and support our school leaders, the role of the governing body in the Covid times

One of the roles that I love is being the Chair of a Governing Body.  The aim of this post is to share what we are doing, as a Board, during these difficult time.  I will refrain from commenting on the role of the Government, DfE and local authority as I intend for this to be both a positive and useful post. What is clear is that governing bodies have a crucial part to play. I am grateful both to the brilliant Clerk and the National Governance Association whose Covid advice pages are fantastic. Firstly; from the outset, the brilliant leadership team that I work with have my unwavering and public support. Regardless. As this is a fast evolving crisis, often with pages of advice, guideline and directives to decipher and digest on a daily basis. As such, the role of governing bodies is twofold: 1.  to prioritise the providing of support to the Headteacher and all colleagues in the school, and 2. to allow them to get on with operational matters and decision making. The role of