Reflections about Twitter: it's just a tool

This is a post that has been fermenting for some time and is linked to some conversations on Twitter after securing a job as an Assistant Head Teacher. Some thought at the time that Twitter is some form of amazing job getting mega thing. Others still insist on calling it the best CPD in the known universe. I may embellish a little of course...

But. This is the thing. Twitter is pants. It's the people who engage with others through twitter and the careful selection of who you interact with that makes twitter an amazing tool for connecting like minded professionals.

As the search above demonstrates, twitter is full of rubbish. Also, this place is full of resource grabbing life sucking people who have always existed on Internet forums and the like. It's also full of muppets who are happy to badger and harass those who give up their own time for the greater good, Jo Debens and the set up of a Geography Dropbox being a prime and recent example.

There are also those who don't like what they read. Just don't follow them. Block them even. But should we reduce ourselves to this?

Not that I know what it's all about. But at least argue in person maybe? Anyway, I'll just choose to ignore just as I would stop watching a rubbish television programme.

So, how come I've sent over 30,000 of the buggers? That is a good question. Twitter is the tool that has connected me to many like minded professional people. I believe that nothing is as powerful as face-to-face conversations and talk (not always over a coffee or a real ale, but it sometimes helps), but I have met some fantastic people through twitter that have interacted, shared and exchanged ideas and resources, organised events and given advice and laughs. At Priory Geography, we use twitter as a banter tool. At the end of the day, why take ourselves too seriously?

Twitter is a useful tool, but it's the people that make it an amazing place to be.

Don't like what I've said? Unfollow then.

Comments

What makes a learning experience profound? Personal reflections and possible implications for classroom practice.

I have recently begun a Leadership Pathways journey. As part of the first core day, we were asked to reflect on a profound learning experience. This got me thinking about how many profound learning experiences I have both been involved in, and how many I have been able to give to others. Our group came up with a huge long list, but these are my five. Emotional Connected Demanding Reflective Collaborative As always, these are personal thoughts and quite mixed up. I put them here so that I can look back on them (plus they’d get lost inside my world-cup-free brain) 1. Emotional I can’t think of a time where deep learning hasn’t engaged my emotions. From being awe inspired to that tingle feeling when a student gets a light bulb moment. From this-is-the-happiest-day-ever, to I-think-I’m-about-to die. How often do we engage the emotions of those we teach? Here, I would argue that having a safe learning environment i...

Banned Word Board

Today I want to share some simple ideas that I have found to be very effective in the classroom. I can't say that they are my own original ideas, although I have played around with them. The first is the Banned word Board. This is a simple display in the classroom that lists a number of words that are not allowed to be used by pupils in their written or oral answers. The effect has been an increase in the quality of written work, and I have almost made comments such as 'Sir it's simple, the stuff just affects the thing and causes people problems'. Pupils are now more able to use specific language, something that is vital especially at GCSE. I have had to make a few modifications, such as the introduction of 'Heavenly Words' This is an additional display placed on the ceiling. I found this necessary as pupils needed some stimulus in finding replacement words. After advice received after posting the idea on the SLN forum , I have also introduced semi-banned words...

Eliminating workload: are curriculum change, behaviour and tutoring the elephants in the room?

The three reports published in March by the workload review groups make interesting reading. They have been informed by the workload survey, although didn't contain a huge proportion of teachers nor make much reference to research (with the exception of the planning report). The recommendations, to me and the team I work with, are common sense. However, three activities that generate workload were missing and the process has failed to take a holistic approach because, let's face it, all issues are workload issues, indeed each report contains the standard phrase 'there is no single reason behind excessive workload.' The three areas missing are top down curriculum change, behaviour management and tutoring. Now, before I start, all of these are essential, but do have major workload implications, especially if we want teachers to focus on the main thing, which is teaching and learning. Every decision made should ensure that teachers are able to collaboratively plan s...

David Rogers

Search This Blog