Skip to main content

Curriculum changes–some reflections


Even through my short career, there has been constant change.  It sometimes seems that the road ahead is sometimes more of a roundabout.  Is the curriculum stuck in a continual cycle?  This post will be of interest to teachers of geography, although the points could be applied to the profession as a whole.  It promises to be a messy post this one!

Through involvement in the Geographical Association, I’ve come across the Standish proposals. (Download here as a PDF).  Here are some of my own reflections on the changes:

1. Conversations about WHAT we teach are as important as HOW we teach.

I believe that we should always be talking about pedagogy and content.  The National Curriculum for England and Wales has always allowed time for teaching addition topics (admittedly, the first incarnation had far too much content to allow this!).  I’ve always engaged in the what and tried to encourage debate within the department around this.  As a result, we have chosen which perspectives we teach from, which content we cover, for example.  The current changes and consultations challenge us as a profession to engage in WHAT should be included and I believe that we should be engaged in that debate.

2. We must move beyond the ‘it’s boring’ argument.

To me, the Standish curriculum is morally wrong.  It presents one viewpoint, that of Regional Geography, which in turn presents one version of the ‘truth.’  I believe that the curriculum should encourage young people to engage critically with their surroundings.  To actively question, find problems, solve them and find out about the interactions between their environment and the people around them.  This curriculum is based upon a US higher education system, not the one we have in the UK.  We need to urge the UK academic community to engage with the debate.  There is no personal geography in there and those that chose which countries to focus on will create the ‘truth.’

To me, the Standish curriculum is far too prescriptive and has far too much repetition.  As a ‘part’ curriculum it would take far too much time to cover the content. It does not reflect current school geography, nor the time it would take to change things (having said that, neither do the alternatives…)

What it is not, is boring.  A curriculum document will never be inspiring.  To me, it’s not a valid argument to simple say ‘It would be boring to teach.’  It’s our interpretation of a curriculum that is creative, inspiring and imaginative for students.  No GSCE or A’Level specification has ever set my world alight.  Come to think of it, only the ‘Importance of Geography’ statement in the existing National Curriculum is that interesting.  Does that mean that students find geography and geography teaching at our school boring?

3. It’s really hard to create a curriculum.

I wouldn’t have a clue where to start in deciding what every person in England should be learning about in geography.  I’ll leave the politics to the politicians, but I will ensure that I engage in every opportunity to ‘have my say.’

Personally, I’m not in a position to decide what geography is needed, especially if it is to tie in to higher education.  I can only provide part of the picture.

4. Head teachers need to put as much trust in the professionalism of their teachers as the coalition promise to do. (I know that promises can be broken.)

This comment is  still in formation, and I admit that it is naive and idealistic Winking smile

I’ve always had a issue with the argument that a curriculum doesn’t mention X, Y and Z.  I suppose, fieldwork may be an exception to the rule, but technology, for me is an issue.  If we are striving toward a situation where the use of technology is not the main focus of learning (in geography) but a pervasive presence, then why does it need to be mentioned?  Maybe this is putting too much faith in the argumentative talents of school middle leaders?  I know that my argument is linked to learning, not the curriculum.  The exception is fieldwork, which is justified by its inclusion in Exam Specifications and the National Curriculum.

5.  There is always some positive

Standish is highly respected by the DfE.  They asked him to produce the curriculum.  It mentions a lot and clearly sets out earth sciences (physical geography) as a clear part of geography.  Science’s curriculum gets agreed a long time before geography’s.  Science also have a claim to earth sciences…..

Anyhow,  if you’re a geography teacher, and even if you’re not.  I would strongly urge you to engage with the debate.


  1. interesting stuff alright.

    i am no expert in reading curriculum but as a teacher of Geography I worry that this version seems to be a whole pile of stuff we have to get into the heads of our pupils.
    There doesn't seem to be enough room for personal choice for the teacher or the students. There is also no mention of personal geography (though i think i could fit it in amongst the 'local geography' section)
    I am old enough to remember my head of dept cutting up the 144(?) statements from the first version of the national curriculum. I can see her desperately trying to plan the curriculum so that all boxes could be ticked off. i worry there is more than a element of that in these 17 pages.
    I agree with you that as a secondary geography teacher i only see part of the whole but i do not want my pupils experience at KS3 and 4 to be too determined by what universities say they should know.
    Finally my "there is always some positive" would be that i have every faith in my own ability to put a #geographyriot tinge to whatever curriculum is put upon me. :)

  2. Thank you for taking the time to comment. I agree that the lack of personal choice is wrong. I also agree that Gove isn't in my classroom! ;-)

    I know that I deliberately focused on HE providing alternatives, but am aware and indeed champion other options. However, I feel that Geography is essentially and academic discipline past KS3, and healthy HE geography departments are needed to provide the future of the subject...

    I agree about the length. If what I understand about what the DfE want (essentially 2-3 pages), both Standish and the GA's are too long. However, I'm not too familiar with the politics to say...

    I too plan lots of #geographyriot s. :-)


Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

#GAConf22: A paradigm shift for anti-racist, decolonised teaching and inclusion

 " You can't start a fire,  You can't start a fire without a spark" Bruce Springsteen.  Well, it's been a fair while since I felt the motivation or the need to blog. Whilst not a story for now, over the past five years I've danced along the knife edge and, often, the call of the abyss has been both tempting and compelling. Certainly, my failing in both my personal and professional life have been numerous. But. This is not about me, but the people that have (re)ignited the spark to the fire in my soul. I realise that this is from the perspective of a privileged, white, middle class male view. I even have a beard. I am scared of getting it wrong on this topic. Teach me if I am wrong, it is from the position of a learner. I was looking forward to the GA Conference this year, the first face to face since 2019. I have to say that Alan , as president, and the Geographical Association's team did a fantastic job at being inclusive. The hybrid format allowed peopl

What makes a learning experience profound? Personal reflections and possible implications for classroom practice.

I have recently begun a Leadership Pathways journey.  As part of the first core day, we were asked to reflect on a profound learning experience. This got me thinking about how many profound learning experiences I have both been involved in, and how many I have been able to give to others.  Our group came up with a huge long list, but these are my five. Emotional Connected Demanding Reflective Collaborative As always, these are personal thoughts and quite mixed up.  I put them here so that I can look back on them (plus they’d get lost inside my world-cup-free brain) 1. Emotional I can’t think of a time where deep learning hasn’t engaged my emotions.  From being awe inspired to that tingle feeling when a student gets a light bulb moment.  From this-is-the-happiest-day-ever, to I-think-I’m-about-to die.  How often do we engage the emotions of those we teach?  Here, I would argue that having a safe learning environment is not always conducive to profound

Trust and support our school leaders, the role of the governing body in the Covid times

One of the roles that I love is being the Chair of a Governing Body.  The aim of this post is to share what we are doing, as a Board, during these difficult time.  I will refrain from commenting on the role of the Government, DfE and local authority as I intend for this to be both a positive and useful post. What is clear is that governing bodies have a crucial part to play. I am grateful both to the brilliant Clerk and the National Governance Association whose Covid advice pages are fantastic. Firstly; from the outset, the brilliant leadership team that I work with have my unwavering and public support. Regardless. As this is a fast evolving crisis, often with pages of advice, guideline and directives to decipher and digest on a daily basis. As such, the role of governing bodies is twofold: 1.  to prioritise the providing of support to the Headteacher and all colleagues in the school, and 2. to allow them to get on with operational matters and decision making. The role of