Skip to main content

Technology: It’s important but isn’t a one size fits all.

 

2014-08-16 17.30.17

 

I’ve been talking to lots of people about technology recently and, at the risk of sounding like a broken record, I think it’s worth saying a few things. Again.  I know that the use of technology in school makes teaching and learning better.  It can smooth the ‘back office’ and planning tasks to free up time.  It can provide swift and accurate data.  It can be used in transformative ways in the classroom.  For example, set up a geocache or a travelbug.  Set it off on an adventure.  Track it.  The map above is my son’s travelbug.  It’s not up-to-date. It’s now in Ney York City, USA.  I know that the connections are being made in your mind.  Geography, Art, Maths, English, History, Science….  It can all hinge off a £2 piece of metal and a smartphone.

The problem I do have is with the idea that schools should subscribe to one flavour of technology.  This is not only mental, it just doesn’t make pedagogical sense.  I believe that teachers should be autonomous professionals that select the best tool for the job for the young people in front of them.  It’s true.  Teachers really do have a lot of autonomy when you think about it.  What I can’t stand is the idea that injecting any from of technology, wholesale, into every classroom and then demanding that every teacher uses it with every pupil.  You may as well say ‘Don;t bother about all of this other stuff, that works just as well or better and that you know.’

Teachers have to spend time to adjust to new systems. 

This is far too top down, rather that bottom up.  Responding to learning needs, rather than to a shiny sales pitch.

Now, before you start, I do have affiliations with many of the big names.  Google. Microsoft. Apple.  But, I advocate what works.  Always have.  There are some tools that these three provide that are absolutely pants when you look beyond the shiny marketing plans; visit schools and scratch beneath the surface and discover that all of that money has been spent on doing exactly the same thing as you’ve always done, just on a shiny consumer good.

So, what would I advocate?  I would say that Ollie Bray’s minimum classroom specification still holds water.  And I totally agree re IWBs.  I would also involve Digital Leaders (both staff and students) in developing grass roots pedagogical development, driven by technology.  I’d speak to staff and ask what they want.  I would add a simple visualiser (around £100, hyperlink for eg as i use them) and then some investment on ‘seed’ devices in certain areas.  I would also advocate using what you have, but better.  PowerPoint and textbooks aren’t evil, however when used by muppets, they can seem so.  Also, do you know what programmes are sitting on machines already? OneNote anyone? 

What I wouldn’t advocate is throwing in a load of machines or devices then expecting miracles to happen.

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

High Impact, Low effort

This month is the start of the #29daysofwriting challenge.  I enjoyed this last year and will be using my Staffrm account to post.  I'll also be reporting here, both to give a little more detail and to keep a log of what I have written. The challenge developed a great sense of community last year, which is why I'm choosing to write on Staffrm. What I would say to those who are new to writing or don't want to run out of ideas is: Write for yourself. Clarify an idea, write something out loud. The process of distilling thoughts into writing is immensely beneficial to your practice. If other read, comment and respond, that's a bonus. Ignore the muppets who know nothing of your context, style or students. Mix it up - I like to read about real stuff from real classrooms and schools and also about other stuff.  If we always write about school, how does that work for workload? If you've nothing nice to say, don't say it. So, the following has been ...
5 comments
Read more

What makes a learning experience profound? Personal reflections and possible implications for classroom practice.

I have recently begun a Leadership Pathways journey.  As part of the first core day, we were asked to reflect on a profound learning experience. This got me thinking about how many profound learning experiences I have both been involved in, and how many I have been able to give to others.  Our group came up with a huge long list, but these are my five. Emotional Connected Demanding Reflective Collaborative As always, these are personal thoughts and quite mixed up.  I put them here so that I can look back on them (plus they’d get lost inside my world-cup-free brain) 1. Emotional I can’t think of a time where deep learning hasn’t engaged my emotions.  From being awe inspired to that tingle feeling when a student gets a light bulb moment.  From this-is-the-happiest-day-ever, to I-think-I’m-about-to die.  How often do we engage the emotions of those we teach?  Here, I would argue that having a safe learning environment i...
4 comments
Read more

Banned Word Board

Today I want to share some simple ideas that I have found to be very effective in the classroom. I can't say that they are my own original ideas, although I have played around with them. The first is the Banned word Board. This is a simple display in the classroom that lists a number of words that are not allowed to be used by pupils in their written or oral answers. The effect has been an increase in the quality of written work, and I have almost made comments such as 'Sir it's simple, the stuff just affects the thing and causes people problems'. Pupils are now more able to use specific language, something that is vital especially at GCSE. I have had to make a few modifications, such as the introduction of 'Heavenly Words' This is an additional display placed on the ceiling. I found this necessary as pupils needed some stimulus in finding replacement words. After advice received after posting the idea on the SLN forum , I have also introduced semi-banned words...
Post a Comment
Read more