Skip to main content

Action Aid Teach Climate Action - 1

Am on the train home from Victoria with my head spinning with possibilities. The cause of which is an excellent and inspirational gathering of academics, NGO's and teachers organised by Dan R-E of Action Aid. During the day 12 fifteen minute presentations were given from a broad cross section of the academic community, from Art to Psychology and the NEF to Feminism. The core theme was how education can tackle the issue of Climate Change from different perspectives. I hope that this will be the first post of a number based upon my thoughts and ideas.

This post is a raw idea and I'd welcome feedback - especially if it's not particularly original!

The idea is based upon Ian Roberts' (from the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine) presentation about health and energy/climate change. He argued that by dealing with climate change by reducing carbon emissions there would be revolutionary, knock,on health benefits. He also argued that our dependence on fossil fuels leads to traffic deaths, unpleasant environments, higher average BMI and conflict over resources.

So, imagine a lesson:

Start with this:


Tell pupils that the planet has an infection of humans. The only way to save the planet is to change their behaviour. The only way to save the planet is to reduce carbon emissions as the virus is climate change / carbon emissions. There's lots of room to link into the economy here also. What if there were no cars? Better health. Less people getting killed. Less wars over energy supplies. Cleaner streets and air.

This leads to a nice cross-curricular link with History ( I also think that a some post-apocalyptic imagery of Fallout 3 could be worked in here also!) all about rationing.

In a nutshell, pupils will create a ration book / system for a cleaner, greener world to get rid of the virus. Research the impacts of various activities that could reduce carbon emissions. For example, eating meat, using hot water, driving a car. The key message is how to get across to pupils that as well as individual change, there needs to be structural change where organisations, institutions and government encourage change. This introduces scenario where people are forced to change their lifestyles for the greater good, a change enforced by government.

Linked together with the Carbon Footprint Project this series of lessons would get over the message that:
  • Individual actions are important, but that for real change larger bodies need to endorse and initiate change
  • Carbon rationing could lead to a number of benefits for society such as fewer wars, less obesity and a reduction in chronic illnesses whose underlying cause is our dependence on fossil fuel.


Image by Flicr user freeparking and used under a Creative Commons Licence.

Comments

  1. It was a great day,I really like your idea, I'm wondering about a gis application, there's a conference at leeds uni tommorrow. Graham Clarke is dealing with health inequality in uk, and using gis, I feel there is a way to put this health/climate change relationship together in the class room using gis - although unsure how ?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Some really great ideas there - thanks

    ReplyDelete
  3. Very nice Mr. R and good to hear that the event went so well. Dan deserved it to be a success after the effort he put into it...
    I like the ration book idea very much...

    ReplyDelete
  4. Vicky - I like the GIS angle, something worth thinking about carefully.

    LindyM many thanks

    Alan - the day was structured in a refreshing way which is great for someone like me who has the concentration span of a gold fish!

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

What makes a learning experience profound? Personal reflections and possible implications for classroom practice.

I have recently begun a Leadership Pathways journey.  As part of the first core day, we were asked to reflect on a profound learning experience. This got me thinking about how many profound learning experiences I have both been involved in, and how many I have been able to give to others.  Our group came up with a huge long list, but these are my five. Emotional Connected Demanding Reflective Collaborative As always, these are personal thoughts and quite mixed up.  I put them here so that I can look back on them (plus they’d get lost inside my world-cup-free brain) 1. Emotional I can’t think of a time where deep learning hasn’t engaged my emotions.  From being awe inspired to that tingle feeling when a student gets a light bulb moment.  From this-is-the-happiest-day-ever, to I-think-I’m-about-to die.  How often do we engage the emotions of those we teach?  Here, I would argue that having a safe learning environment is not always conducive to profound

The danger of Teaching and Twitter conversations: poorly formed bipolar arguments.

Sometimes in life, there really are only two options.  Get the wrong one and you can look like a muppet.  Take this useful sign for the toilets in Morocco.  I successfully navigated it, choosing the right option.  The result? No egg on my face.  As a mountain leader, there are many right or wrong decisions that I’ve faced, as there are all over life.  It’s not a good idea to let inexperienced young people walk themselves down Snowdon.  They may die or be seriously injured.  If someone is showing the signs and symptoms of hyperthermia, you need to treat it fast in a specified way.  There is no real arguing with this sign: Other options are less obvious.  Take this sign recently spotted near to where I live: Now, I wouldn’t consider sleeping in a bin.  However, faced with a sub-zero night, I could see the appeal.  The danger? Being tipped into one of those huge lorries with a compactor. (by the way, I only really considered all of this thanks to questions from my four year old boy).

Banned Word Board

Today I want to share some simple ideas that I have found to be very effective in the classroom. I can't say that they are my own original ideas, although I have played around with them. The first is the Banned word Board. This is a simple display in the classroom that lists a number of words that are not allowed to be used by pupils in their written or oral answers. The effect has been an increase in the quality of written work, and I have almost made comments such as 'Sir it's simple, the stuff just affects the thing and causes people problems'. Pupils are now more able to use specific language, something that is vital especially at GCSE. I have had to make a few modifications, such as the introduction of 'Heavenly Words' This is an additional display placed on the ceiling. I found this necessary as pupils needed some stimulus in finding replacement words. After advice received after posting the idea on the SLN forum , I have also introduced semi-banned words